-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender Equality Review Conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Story
Disengagement: OSCE is monitoring how sides in eastern Ukraine deliver on agreement
- Date:
- Source:
- OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Arms control, Conflict prevention and resolution
On 21 September 2016, the participants of the Trilateral Contact Group committed in Minsk to an agreement on “disengagement” which Ertugrul Apakan, the Chief Monitor of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), said would go some way “to alleviate the situation for civilians who continue to pay the price for the ceasefire violations.”
The Framework Decision relating to disengagement of forces and hardware by Ukrainian armed forces and armed formations, starting in Petrivske, Zolote and Stanytsia Luhanska areas, was signed by the Special Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office in Ukraine, representatives of the Governments of Ukraine and the Russian Federation to the Trilateral Contact Group, and initialled by representatives of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions.
What is disengagement?
As specified in the Decision, disengagement will be carried out through a withdrawal of armed forces/formations and hardware from their current positions, starting in three areas, with a view to creating disengagement areas that will be, as a rule, at least 2km wide and 2km deep. Moving forward into disengagement areas is prohibited.
The role of OSCE SMM monitors
The signatories of this decision have entrusted the role of monitoring and verification to the SMM, which it will perform as part of its mandate assigned to it by the OSCE’s 57 participating States.
The sides are required to provide baseline information on the locations of armed forces/formations and hardware in the area to the OSCE SMM prior to disengagement, as well as information on the proposed destinations of these elements upon completion of disengagement. Once the disengagement is completed, the sides should notify the SMM of the completion of disengagement within no more than 24 hours once it has been completed in the agreed area.
After safe and secure access is ensured for SMM monitors in disengagement areas and in the new locations for armed forces/formations and hardware after disengagement, the SMM will monitor and verify the disengagement process on a constant basis by means of patrolling and remote observation in the agreed disengagement areas.
SMM monitors patrolling in Petrivske, Donetsk region, September 2016. As part of its mandate, the SMM will monitor the process of disengagement and compliance in the Petrivske, Zolote and Stanytsia Luhanska areas.
Mined area in Petrivske, Donetsk region, September 2016. For the SMM to do its job, the Ukrainian Armed Forces and armed formations must provide monitors with free and safe access to the areas agreed for disengagement. Only with access, can the SMM verify compliance and help to build trust between the sides to enable sustainable ceasefire.
A demining expert at work in Zolote, Luhansk region, September 2016. Even though some areas have been demined, mines still constitute a serious risk that affects people on a daily basis. So far, little effort by the sides to demine has been observed.
Representatives of the Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC), like the Ukrainian members of the JCCC pictured in the Petrivske-Bohdanivka area above (September 2016), should assist the sides in disengaging and assist in ensuring free and safe access for the SMM monitors to verify the process. Disengagement can help the forces and formations prevent skirmishes and reduce fear of an impending attack.
Civilians crossing the destroyed bridge in Stanytsia Luhanska, September 2016. The SMM monitors have heard time and time again that people on both sides of the contact line have had enough – they deserve normalization and are ready for the disengagement of forces and hardware.
SMM monitors visiting the destroyed bridge in Stanytsia Luhanska, September 2016. The bridge in one of the disengagement areas requires urgent repair as it is dangerous for civilians to use. Disengagement can help save lives and allow local people to rebuild their livelihoods.
Civilians queuing at the Stanytsia Luhanska exit-entry checkpoint, September 2016. The disengagement of forces, the withdrawal of weapons, as well as marking, fencing and removal of mines, unexploded ordnance and explosive remnants of war will alleviate the situation for civilians who continue to pay the price for the violations.
OSCE Impact
Discover more stories about how the OSCE improves lives.
Story
OSCE Scholarship for Peace and Security paves the way for a new era in security: how the 2024 cohort put their knowledge into action
18 December 2024
OSCE Secretariat
Story
Breaking Barriers: Empowering Young Women in Politico-Military Security through the OSCE Scholarship Programme
2 August 2023
Forum for Security Co-operation