-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender Equality Review Conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
OSCE Croatia Mission calls for further reform of electoral legislation
- Date:
- Place:
- ZAGREB
- Source:
- OSCE Mission to Croatia (closed), OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
- Fields of work:
- Elections
ZAGREB, 22 December 2004 - In the aftermath of the presidential election due to be held on 2 January, the OSCE Mission to Croatia will submit proposals on electoral reform to the Croatian authorities.
The Mission's reform proposals will be based on a close examination of the evaluation reports to be issued by the State Election Commission (SEC) and GONG - Croatia's leading election support NGO. They will also include conclusions from a recent OSCE-sponsored roundtable with all major Croatian institutions involved with election issues.
The Head of the OSCE Mission to Croatia, Ambassador Peter Semneby, said that recent criticism of campaign financing, the timing of elections, media coverage, and the selection of candidates expressed by several presidential candidates highlighted the need to move forward with electoral reform.
He noted that following the monitoring of earlier presidential and parliamentary elections in Croatia between 1997 and 2003, the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) made a series of recommendations for reform of Croatia's electoral system . While the OSCE will not conduct a formal monitoring of the presidential elections many of the recommendations reappear in successive election observation reports and have yet to be implemented.
"According to these recommendations and those of domestic actors such as GONG, the main areas requiring reform of electoral legislation are the: lack of a permanent body to administer elections; insufficient regulation of campaign financing; ineffective updating of voters' lists; and lack of a clear framework for out-of-country voting," said Ambassador Semneby.
He added that continued attention should be paid to media coverage of elections and access to public media. "The observations that we conducted with the Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights during the parliamentary election campaign in 2003 showed that a balance was achieved only through a very formalistic coverage that many viewers did not find interesting," he said.
"On the positive side, we welcome the Government's intention to open three additional polling stations in Serbia. This will give more Croatian citizens living as refugees the opportunity to engage in Croatia's future," said Ambassador Semneby.
On 18 and 19 November 2004, the Mission, together with representatives of the ODIHR and the Venice Commission (Council of Europe), held a roundtable in Zagreb on electoral legislation reform to facilitate dialogue between Government, Parliamentary representatives, civil society, and academic experts.
The Mission's reform proposals will be based on a close examination of the evaluation reports to be issued by the State Election Commission (SEC) and GONG - Croatia's leading election support NGO. They will also include conclusions from a recent OSCE-sponsored roundtable with all major Croatian institutions involved with election issues.
The Head of the OSCE Mission to Croatia, Ambassador Peter Semneby, said that recent criticism of campaign financing, the timing of elections, media coverage, and the selection of candidates expressed by several presidential candidates highlighted the need to move forward with electoral reform.
He noted that following the monitoring of earlier presidential and parliamentary elections in Croatia between 1997 and 2003, the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) made a series of recommendations for reform of Croatia's electoral system . While the OSCE will not conduct a formal monitoring of the presidential elections many of the recommendations reappear in successive election observation reports and have yet to be implemented.
"According to these recommendations and those of domestic actors such as GONG, the main areas requiring reform of electoral legislation are the: lack of a permanent body to administer elections; insufficient regulation of campaign financing; ineffective updating of voters' lists; and lack of a clear framework for out-of-country voting," said Ambassador Semneby.
He added that continued attention should be paid to media coverage of elections and access to public media. "The observations that we conducted with the Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights during the parliamentary election campaign in 2003 showed that a balance was achieved only through a very formalistic coverage that many viewers did not find interesting," he said.
"On the positive side, we welcome the Government's intention to open three additional polling stations in Serbia. This will give more Croatian citizens living as refugees the opportunity to engage in Croatia's future," said Ambassador Semneby.
On 18 and 19 November 2004, the Mission, together with representatives of the ODIHR and the Venice Commission (Council of Europe), held a roundtable in Zagreb on electoral legislation reform to facilitate dialogue between Government, Parliamentary representatives, civil society, and academic experts.