-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
OSCE Croatia Mission calls for further training on war crimes trials, better judicial co-operation between states
- Date:
- Place:
- ZAGREB
- Source:
- OSCE Mission to Croatia (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Human rights, Democratization
ZAGREB, 20 August 2004 - The decision by the Supreme Court of Croatia to annul the first instance verdict in the so-called Lora war crimes case and return the case for retrial indicates that additional measures are needed to ensure that all parts of the Croatian judiciary are prepared to conduct war crime trials.
"The Supreme Court verdict demonstrates the need to expand training on war crime trials to all county court judges and prosecutors," said the Head of the OSCE Mission to Croatia, Ambassador Peter Semneby.
The Supreme Court concluded that the Split County Court had failed to establish the facts, and, in particular, to summon several witnesses proposed by the prosecution. The Court thus annulled the first instance verdict and returned the case for retrial before a different panel of judges.
"Since many of the witnesses that were not heard live in Serbia and Montenegro, the verdict also underlined the importance of improving inter-state judicial co-operation," Ambassador Semneby said.
The Supreme Court decision is consistent with observations made by the OSCE Mission during its monitoring of war crime trials in Croatia. Between January 2002 and August 2004, the Supreme Court reversed 47 out of 70 individual County Court verdicts in war crime trials. With the release of two war crime reports in June, the Mission acknowledged recent improvements and identified areas where further reform was needed.
The Mission has welcomed and participated in the initial round of training seminars on war crime trials for judges and prosecutors which were held from May 2004. It is ready to provide further assistance as the training continues.
"The Supreme Court verdict demonstrates the need to expand training on war crime trials to all county court judges and prosecutors," said the Head of the OSCE Mission to Croatia, Ambassador Peter Semneby.
The Supreme Court concluded that the Split County Court had failed to establish the facts, and, in particular, to summon several witnesses proposed by the prosecution. The Court thus annulled the first instance verdict and returned the case for retrial before a different panel of judges.
"Since many of the witnesses that were not heard live in Serbia and Montenegro, the verdict also underlined the importance of improving inter-state judicial co-operation," Ambassador Semneby said.
The Supreme Court decision is consistent with observations made by the OSCE Mission during its monitoring of war crime trials in Croatia. Between January 2002 and August 2004, the Supreme Court reversed 47 out of 70 individual County Court verdicts in war crime trials. With the release of two war crime reports in June, the Mission acknowledged recent improvements and identified areas where further reform was needed.
The Mission has welcomed and participated in the initial round of training seminars on war crime trials for judges and prosecutors which were held from May 2004. It is ready to provide further assistance as the training continues.