-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
OSCE Mission calls for reform of domestic war crime procedures in Croatia
- Date:
- Place:
- ZAGREB
- Source:
- OSCE Mission to Croatia (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Human rights, Democratization
ZAGREB, 22 June 2004 - The OSCE Mission to Croatia today issued two reports on war crime trials conducted in Croatian courts acknowledging recent improvements but concluding that additional reform is needed to provide for impartial domestic adjudication of war crimes in all Croatian courts.
The two reports provide an analysis based on statistical information as well as individual cases derived from the Mission's country-wide monitoring of war crimes proceedings.
Approximately 500 individuals were processed for war crimes before 12 county courts from 2002 until mid-2004.
The reports were jointly presented today by the Head of the OSCE Mission to Croatia, Ambassador Peter Semneby, and Croatia's Justice Minister, Vesna Skare Ozbolt.
"In connection with its co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), there has been an observable increased government commitment in 2004 to prosecute all war crimes perpetrators, regardless of national origin, as well as growing public acceptance of this approach," Ambassador Semneby said.
"However, the reports indicate that the national origin of defendants and victims continue to effect war crime proceedings."
"While there have been improvements in the past year, these reports show that additional measures are still needed to ensure that all parts of the Croatian judiciary are sufficiently prepared to impartially adjudicate war crime trials," he added.
"This is essential to achieve the Government's stated objective of a uniform standard of criminal responsibility, regardless of national origin, as well as a single standard of justice for victims."
The OSCE Mission Head commended efforts already undertaken by the Ministry of Justice, with the ICTY, to provide training for judges in the Zagreb, Osijek, Split, and Rijeka County Courts that may receive cases transferred from the ICTY.
He said that these efforts were likely to make it possible for the Croatian judiciary to handle the limited number of cases that are expected to be transferred from the ICTY in the near future.
He observed that other county courts will continue to conduct the vast majority of war crime trials and suggested that training and other reform initiatives should be extended to all judges, prosecutors, and defence lawyers responsible for such cases so that a two-tier system of justice for war crimes does not develop in Croatia.
Other issues of concern include changed witness testimonies, unsubstantiated charges that are later abandoned, in absentia trials and discrepancies in the conviction rates between Croats and Serbs standing trial for similar offences.
A powerful indicator of the need for reform is the high rate of war crime verdicts overturned by the Supreme Court, requiring re-trial.
"This warrants targeted intervention to ensure fair trial for all defendants and even-handed administration of justice," said the OSCE Mission Head.
He particularly commended the ongoing efforts of the Chief State Prosecutor to review questionable war crime investigations and indictments, primarily against Serbs, and hoped that these efforts would result in a reduction in the number of faulty war crime trials.
In 2003 and in the first part of 2004, an increased number of old cases against Serbs have been dropped due to lack of evidence.
"It would be better if reviews of such cases could take place earlier in the process to avoid unnecessary arrests and detention of Serb returnees, which have a negative impact on the return process," Ambassador Semneby said.
The reports also identify the increasing need for inter-state co-operation between judicial authorities in order to address all war crime cases in Croatia.
Ambassador Semneby added that recent co-operation on witness testimony between judicial authorities in Croatia and Serbia and Montenegro was an encouraging sign of more wide-ranging co-operation.
The main observations of the Mission's reports are reflected in the European Commission's Opinion on Croatia's EU membership application issued on 21 April 2004.
The two reports provide an analysis based on statistical information as well as individual cases derived from the Mission's country-wide monitoring of war crimes proceedings.
Approximately 500 individuals were processed for war crimes before 12 county courts from 2002 until mid-2004.
The reports were jointly presented today by the Head of the OSCE Mission to Croatia, Ambassador Peter Semneby, and Croatia's Justice Minister, Vesna Skare Ozbolt.
"In connection with its co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), there has been an observable increased government commitment in 2004 to prosecute all war crimes perpetrators, regardless of national origin, as well as growing public acceptance of this approach," Ambassador Semneby said.
"However, the reports indicate that the national origin of defendants and victims continue to effect war crime proceedings."
"While there have been improvements in the past year, these reports show that additional measures are still needed to ensure that all parts of the Croatian judiciary are sufficiently prepared to impartially adjudicate war crime trials," he added.
"This is essential to achieve the Government's stated objective of a uniform standard of criminal responsibility, regardless of national origin, as well as a single standard of justice for victims."
The OSCE Mission Head commended efforts already undertaken by the Ministry of Justice, with the ICTY, to provide training for judges in the Zagreb, Osijek, Split, and Rijeka County Courts that may receive cases transferred from the ICTY.
He said that these efforts were likely to make it possible for the Croatian judiciary to handle the limited number of cases that are expected to be transferred from the ICTY in the near future.
He observed that other county courts will continue to conduct the vast majority of war crime trials and suggested that training and other reform initiatives should be extended to all judges, prosecutors, and defence lawyers responsible for such cases so that a two-tier system of justice for war crimes does not develop in Croatia.
Other issues of concern include changed witness testimonies, unsubstantiated charges that are later abandoned, in absentia trials and discrepancies in the conviction rates between Croats and Serbs standing trial for similar offences.
A powerful indicator of the need for reform is the high rate of war crime verdicts overturned by the Supreme Court, requiring re-trial.
"This warrants targeted intervention to ensure fair trial for all defendants and even-handed administration of justice," said the OSCE Mission Head.
He particularly commended the ongoing efforts of the Chief State Prosecutor to review questionable war crime investigations and indictments, primarily against Serbs, and hoped that these efforts would result in a reduction in the number of faulty war crime trials.
In 2003 and in the first part of 2004, an increased number of old cases against Serbs have been dropped due to lack of evidence.
"It would be better if reviews of such cases could take place earlier in the process to avoid unnecessary arrests and detention of Serb returnees, which have a negative impact on the return process," Ambassador Semneby said.
The reports also identify the increasing need for inter-state co-operation between judicial authorities in order to address all war crime cases in Croatia.
Ambassador Semneby added that recent co-operation on witness testimony between judicial authorities in Croatia and Serbia and Montenegro was an encouraging sign of more wide-ranging co-operation.
The main observations of the Mission's reports are reflected in the European Commission's Opinion on Croatia's EU membership application issued on 21 April 2004.