-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Story
Protecting charities from terrorist abuse
- Date:
- Source:
- OSCE Secretariat
- Fields of work:
- Countering terrorism
Charities and other non-profit organizations (NPOs) intend to fulfil important social functions and serve the public. Yet they could be used as a cover by terrorists to secure access to funds and resources. How can governments enforce policies to counter terrorism without undermining the valuable work done by NPOs?
Relations between the state authorities and civil society vary across the OSCE region. In many countries regulatory constraints and suspicion on the part of state authorities make it challenging for NPOs to operate. Their ability to interact with foreign counterparts and receive funds from abroad is a particular point of sensitivity.
Some countries’ laws have been criticized for using the pretext of countering terrorism and its financing to impose undue restrictions on the freedoms of association and expression, or on the freedom of religion or belief. In other cases such laws have been used to curb the operations of NPOs altogether.
Representatives of civil society point to several barriers to the activities of NPOs, for example, in the form of overly strict registration and reporting requirements.
The threat of terrorist abuse of NPOs is real but low. Paradoxically, NPOs can often be crucial in the fight against terrorism since they may work to tackle the conditions that are conducive to this serious crime.
The challenge for States is how to design and implement legislation and policies to combat terrorism without infringing on the freedom of association and the right of NPOs to access funding and carry out activities.
We encourage states to first study what they are dealing with and make their measures adequate to what they conclude as the results of their study, so that these measures are proportionate to the risks.
Hear from three experts, Svetlana Martynova, a Legal Officer at the UN Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate, Nigel Tarling, of the Charity Commission for England and Wales, and Peter Romaniuk, Senior Non-Resident Fellow at the Global Center on Cooperative Security, working to support governments in navigating a tricky balance on how to effectively counter terrorism without undermining the useful work done by NPOs.
OSCE Impact
Discover more stories about how the OSCE improves lives.

