-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
OSCE CiO disappointed by outcome of Serbian Parliamentary vote on Broadcasting Agency Council
- Date:
- Place:
- THE HAGUE
- Source:
- OSCE Chairpersonship, OSCE Mission to Serbia
- Fields of work:
- Media freedom and development, Democratization
THE HAGUE, 16 July 2003 - The OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Netherlands Foreign Minister Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, is disappointed by the results of yesterday's vote of the Serbian Parliament on the Broadcasting Agency Council.
"While I acknowledge the decision of the Serbian Parliament, I cannot help being disappointed by the fact that the Serbian Parliament voted in favour of keeping the three disputed Broadcasting Agency's Council Members in place. This decision does not correspond with the OSCE's position on the issue", said the Netherlands Chairman-in-Office.
He further explained that the OSCE would have preferred a repeat of the election procedure for the three disputed Council members and the two Council members who resigned, in conformity with the law.
The parliamentary vote reconfirmed the illegal appointment of three disputed members to the Broadcasting Council, which was not in line with legal procedure in the first place. The vote not only casts a shadow over the legitimacy of the Council, but is also contrary to the OSCE position, which is based on the legal criteria.
"I call on the responsible authorities to address and implement the much needed media reforms in the country, in order to strengthen the establishment of professional and objective media in Serbia," the CiO said.
The Minister also said that the OSCE, through its Mission in Serbia and Montenegro and the Representative on Freedom of the Media, is ready to continue to lend its advice to help reforms in the media field.
The Broadcasting Agency Council, first appointed on 11 April 2003 under the Serbian Law on Broadcasting, has an important function to carry out in deciding upon the allocation of national television frequencies.
"While I acknowledge the decision of the Serbian Parliament, I cannot help being disappointed by the fact that the Serbian Parliament voted in favour of keeping the three disputed Broadcasting Agency's Council Members in place. This decision does not correspond with the OSCE's position on the issue", said the Netherlands Chairman-in-Office.
He further explained that the OSCE would have preferred a repeat of the election procedure for the three disputed Council members and the two Council members who resigned, in conformity with the law.
The parliamentary vote reconfirmed the illegal appointment of three disputed members to the Broadcasting Council, which was not in line with legal procedure in the first place. The vote not only casts a shadow over the legitimacy of the Council, but is also contrary to the OSCE position, which is based on the legal criteria.
"I call on the responsible authorities to address and implement the much needed media reforms in the country, in order to strengthen the establishment of professional and objective media in Serbia," the CiO said.
The Minister also said that the OSCE, through its Mission in Serbia and Montenegro and the Representative on Freedom of the Media, is ready to continue to lend its advice to help reforms in the media field.
The Broadcasting Agency Council, first appointed on 11 April 2003 under the Serbian Law on Broadcasting, has an important function to carry out in deciding upon the allocation of national television frequencies.