-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
OSCE Office presents report on alternative sentencing in Armenia
- Date:
- Place:
- YEREVAN
- Source:
- OSCE Office in Yerevan (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Human rights
YEREVAN, 16 March 2005 - A research study exploring prospects for non-custodial measures of punishment in Armenia was presented today to the public.
The main outcome of the research is that key actors involved in the criminal justice reform process will get reliable guidance to help them identify priority areas to develop efficient alternatives to imprisonment. The Criminal and the newly-adopted Criminal-Executive Codes create the necessary legal basis for the implementation of penal sanctions, including alternative sentences.
The report was prepared by the non-governmental organization Advanced Social Technologies, with support from the OSCE Office in Yerevan, Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation and the British Embassy in Armenia.
"All OSCE participating States face challenges in implementing criminal justice policy which includes alternative sentencing options," said Stefan Buchmayer, Human Rights Officer at the OSCE Office, opening the event.
"A comprehensive legal framework and an institutional infrastructure for the implementation of alternative sentences facilitate making decisions for a state and its society in choosing a criminal justice policy."
The scope of the research included development of the research tools, data analysis, and an elaboration of recommendations for action. A survey was also conducted among target groups such as judges, prosecutors, advocates, police and Criminal Executive Department of the Justice Ministry, as well as private entrepreneurs, offenders and their families, and the public at large.
Anna Minasyan, Head of the Advanced Social Technologies and the co-author of the study, said that the majority of stakeholders in the process had a positive attitude towards alternative sentencing options.
"They believe that an enlarged practice of alternative sanctions corresponds to modern trends in international criminal law and contributes to important processes, such as proper rehabilitation of the offenders and building public trust towards the criminal justice system."
The main outcome of the research is that key actors involved in the criminal justice reform process will get reliable guidance to help them identify priority areas to develop efficient alternatives to imprisonment. The Criminal and the newly-adopted Criminal-Executive Codes create the necessary legal basis for the implementation of penal sanctions, including alternative sentences.
The report was prepared by the non-governmental organization Advanced Social Technologies, with support from the OSCE Office in Yerevan, Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation and the British Embassy in Armenia.
"All OSCE participating States face challenges in implementing criminal justice policy which includes alternative sentencing options," said Stefan Buchmayer, Human Rights Officer at the OSCE Office, opening the event.
"A comprehensive legal framework and an institutional infrastructure for the implementation of alternative sentences facilitate making decisions for a state and its society in choosing a criminal justice policy."
The scope of the research included development of the research tools, data analysis, and an elaboration of recommendations for action. A survey was also conducted among target groups such as judges, prosecutors, advocates, police and Criminal Executive Department of the Justice Ministry, as well as private entrepreneurs, offenders and their families, and the public at large.
Anna Minasyan, Head of the Advanced Social Technologies and the co-author of the study, said that the majority of stakeholders in the process had a positive attitude towards alternative sentencing options.
"They believe that an enlarged practice of alternative sanctions corresponds to modern trends in international criminal law and contributes to important processes, such as proper rehabilitation of the offenders and building public trust towards the criminal justice system."