-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
OSCE Baku office: Low polling and some problems accompany Azerbaijan's municipal election
- Date:
- Place:
- BAKU
- Source:
- OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Baku (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Elections
BAKU, 21 December 2004 - The Office in Baku today said the municipal elections held last Friday in Azerbaijan fell short of a number of international standards for democratic elections, formulated in the 1990 CSCE/OSCE Copenhagen Document.
It issued the following statement:
"On 17 December Azerbaijan held its second Municipal Elections since independence and the OSCE Office, together with the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES), co-ordinated an observation effort by members of the international diplomatic community and international volunteers.
Some 40 teams were deployed, representing embassies, the OSCE Office in Baku and IFES; there was also a delegation of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe. All members received a thorough briefing beforehand and travelled throughout the country to observe the process from the opening of polling until the conclusion of the counting procedure, visiting over 200 polling stations during the day.
Severe weather conditions, with snow over much of the country and a boycott by the country's major opposition Musavat and Popular Front party groups, may have contributed to the apparent voter apathy. A turnout of generally less than 50 per cent overall and as low as 20 per cent in some municipalities was observed. However, observers noted an increase in the number of women participating in many municipalities, compared with the Presidential Election of 2003.
According to the OSCE Office in Baku, the municipal elections in Azerbaijan fell short of a number of international standards for democratic elections, formulated in the 1990 CSCE/OSCE Copenhagen Document.
Observers reported that the process was conducted in a friendly and calm atmosphere, but a significant number of irregularities were observed during voting and tabulation of election results. Many of these irregularities were serious and could have affected the outcome in the municipalities concerned. These included observed cases of ballot stuffing, protocol falsification, voter list tampering and voters being pressurised. Less serious, but common irregularities included multiple voting, pre-marking and clipping of ballots and the acceptance of inadmissible identification documents.
Elections administration was accomplished at three levels: the Central Election Commission (CEC), 124 Constituency Election Commissions (ConECs), and over 5,129 Precinct Election Commissions (PECs). Across the country, technical preparations prior to the Election were felt by the OSCE Office to have proceeded smoothly and efficiently and that the CEC has tried to provide leadership and professional guidance on election administration in Azerbaijan. However, the findings of the observers indicate a consistent pattern of non-transparent and illegal behaviour throughout the majority of locations visited and reflect a clear, significant and organised effort at the local level to undermine the work accomplished by the CEC.
Interference by representatives of local executive authorities, whether intentionally or from a desire to assist, was often observed to have played a major role in affecting the validity of the process.
The OSCE Office in Baku believes that the overwhelming complexity of the process, which involved in some cases more than 100 candidates for 19 seats, may have contributed to confusion as to the appropriate counting procedure and rendered inexperienced voters unsure of what to do.
The Office stands ready to enter into dialogue and to provide whatever assistance it can to the authorities and civil society in Azerbaijan, in an effort to address the concerns which arise from these municipal elections in order that future electoral processes may meet OSCE commitments for democratic elections."
It issued the following statement:
"On 17 December Azerbaijan held its second Municipal Elections since independence and the OSCE Office, together with the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES), co-ordinated an observation effort by members of the international diplomatic community and international volunteers.
Some 40 teams were deployed, representing embassies, the OSCE Office in Baku and IFES; there was also a delegation of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe. All members received a thorough briefing beforehand and travelled throughout the country to observe the process from the opening of polling until the conclusion of the counting procedure, visiting over 200 polling stations during the day.
Severe weather conditions, with snow over much of the country and a boycott by the country's major opposition Musavat and Popular Front party groups, may have contributed to the apparent voter apathy. A turnout of generally less than 50 per cent overall and as low as 20 per cent in some municipalities was observed. However, observers noted an increase in the number of women participating in many municipalities, compared with the Presidential Election of 2003.
According to the OSCE Office in Baku, the municipal elections in Azerbaijan fell short of a number of international standards for democratic elections, formulated in the 1990 CSCE/OSCE Copenhagen Document.
Observers reported that the process was conducted in a friendly and calm atmosphere, but a significant number of irregularities were observed during voting and tabulation of election results. Many of these irregularities were serious and could have affected the outcome in the municipalities concerned. These included observed cases of ballot stuffing, protocol falsification, voter list tampering and voters being pressurised. Less serious, but common irregularities included multiple voting, pre-marking and clipping of ballots and the acceptance of inadmissible identification documents.
Elections administration was accomplished at three levels: the Central Election Commission (CEC), 124 Constituency Election Commissions (ConECs), and over 5,129 Precinct Election Commissions (PECs). Across the country, technical preparations prior to the Election were felt by the OSCE Office to have proceeded smoothly and efficiently and that the CEC has tried to provide leadership and professional guidance on election administration in Azerbaijan. However, the findings of the observers indicate a consistent pattern of non-transparent and illegal behaviour throughout the majority of locations visited and reflect a clear, significant and organised effort at the local level to undermine the work accomplished by the CEC.
Interference by representatives of local executive authorities, whether intentionally or from a desire to assist, was often observed to have played a major role in affecting the validity of the process.
The OSCE Office in Baku believes that the overwhelming complexity of the process, which involved in some cases more than 100 candidates for 19 seats, may have contributed to confusion as to the appropriate counting procedure and rendered inexperienced voters unsure of what to do.
The Office stands ready to enter into dialogue and to provide whatever assistance it can to the authorities and civil society in Azerbaijan, in an effort to address the concerns which arise from these municipal elections in order that future electoral processes may meet OSCE commitments for democratic elections."