-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender Equality Review Conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
Azerbaijan referendum fails credibility test
- Date:
- Place:
- BAKU
- Source:
- OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Baku (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Elections
BAKU, 26 August 2002 - The OSCE Office in Baku feels it appropriate to echo concerns expressed by observers of the Referendum, held in the Republic of Azerbaijan on Saturday, 24 August.
Whilst the Office was unable to participate in observing the balloting directly, it is clear that several parts of the referendum process give cause for concern. The Referendum Law appears in some parts inadequate to provide the best basis for its purpose and is at odds with the country's Electoral Law, in particular regarding participation of observers. It does not allow for the participation of journalists as observers and does not specifically include non-governmental organizations in that role. Interpretation of the Law by the CEC seems to have been more according to the letter, rather than the spirit of the Law, and thus created obstacles to wider observation and transparency of the process. It is unfortunate that the Law requires a quorum of electorate participation, as this is perceived both as encouraging a boycott of the referendum - as a tool by those opposed to it - and as accusations of forced participation by those in favour.
Accusations and reports of irregularities in the voting process have been numerous and have emanated from the voting population and the whole range of observers. Reports have included ballot stuffing, overt police presence and pressure on voters, multiple voting, use of supplementary voter lists and other forms of ballot rigging. Such reports are too numerous - and from such a wide variety of usually reliable, apolitical sources - to be ignored or dismissed.
It is the belief of the OSCE Office in Baku, therefore, that the process fell short of providing a credible and reliable means of eliciting the views of the population on the issues of the referendum.
Whilst the Office was unable to participate in observing the balloting directly, it is clear that several parts of the referendum process give cause for concern. The Referendum Law appears in some parts inadequate to provide the best basis for its purpose and is at odds with the country's Electoral Law, in particular regarding participation of observers. It does not allow for the participation of journalists as observers and does not specifically include non-governmental organizations in that role. Interpretation of the Law by the CEC seems to have been more according to the letter, rather than the spirit of the Law, and thus created obstacles to wider observation and transparency of the process. It is unfortunate that the Law requires a quorum of electorate participation, as this is perceived both as encouraging a boycott of the referendum - as a tool by those opposed to it - and as accusations of forced participation by those in favour.
Accusations and reports of irregularities in the voting process have been numerous and have emanated from the voting population and the whole range of observers. Reports have included ballot stuffing, overt police presence and pressure on voters, multiple voting, use of supplementary voter lists and other forms of ballot rigging. Such reports are too numerous - and from such a wide variety of usually reliable, apolitical sources - to be ignored or dismissed.
It is the belief of the OSCE Office in Baku, therefore, that the process fell short of providing a credible and reliable means of eliciting the views of the population on the issues of the referendum.