-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
News Item
Children’s rights need better protection in Ukraine’s criminal justice system, finds OSCE-supported report
Multiple interrogations, lack of psychological support, lengthy proceedings, these are just a few of the problems children face in Ukraine’s criminal justice system according to a new OSCE-supported report presented on 1 June 2021.
- Issued on:
- Issued by:
- OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector, Human rights, Rule of law
Multiple interrogations, lack of psychological support, lengthy proceedings, these are just a few of the problems children face in Ukraine’s criminal justice system according to a new OSCE-supported report presented on 1 June 2021. The report comprises the results of civil society research conducted upon the initiative of Ukraine’s Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights and with support of the OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine (PCU).
The report was presented during an online event to mark International Day for the Protection of Children. More than 250 judges, representatives of state authorities, civil society and human rights activists, and other justice sector stakeholders attended the event. It was streamed live for a general audience (https://youtu.be/sl-HE8Gv2n4).
The results indicate that, on average, the judicial review of a criminal case involving a minor takes 4,5 to 5 years, or even longer, to complete. 71 interviews with judges, advocates, prosecutors, psychologists and guardianship authority representatives, as well as reviews of 53 court judgments and analyses of official court statistics related to criminal cases involving minors took place. Of those interviewed, 70% reported that no attempts were made to speed up or give preference to the review of cases involving children despite both national and international legal frameworks stipulating that judicial disputes involving minors should be prioritized and expedited.
“The findings of this research are impressive, especially taking into account the challenging conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. The monitoring demonstrated that courts and administrative bodies do not adhere to international principles of child-friendly justice, significantly exceeding deadlines for the review of cases involving minors, and such cases are often heard without involving children and taking their views into account,” said Lyudmyla Denisova, Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights.
The report contains recommendations for improvements, such as adopting uniform procedural guidelines for establishing ‘green rooms’, which provide a safe and friendly environment for interviewing children; recognizing the admissibility of video interrogations collected from child witnesses or victims in ‘green rooms’; establishing children’s hubs within the criminal justice system; and introducing systematic training on child-friendly justice standards for all relevant stakeholders.
“Being in contact and in conflict with the criminal justice system can be very stressful and even traumatic for children. To mitigate these effects, the justice system must be adapted to children’s needs and their vulnerability. We hope that this report and its recommendations will be useful for all professionals in making the justice system more child-friendly,” said Henrik Villadsen, OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine.
The analysis carried out during the study was based on methodologies that the PCU adapted from the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights’ (ODIHR) method of court monitoring for local conditions. The PCU also helped to train monitors to use the adapted approach, as well as provided funding for the research. The monitoring portion of the research was conducted in fall 2020 and covered 41 court hearings throughout Ukraine.