-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
OSCE Mission to Croatia concerned returnees may lose homes
- Date:
- Place:
- ZAGREB
- Source:
- OSCE Mission to Croatia (closed)
- Fields of work:
- National minority issues, Human rights
ZAGREB, 8 April 2005 - The Head of the OSCE Mission to Croatia is concerned that an increasing number of Serb returnees in Croatia may lose their homes due to unfair and incomplete legal regulations and biased decisions by some local courts.
The recent case of Stevo Zabrdac, a Serb refugee living near the town of Daruvar, two hours from the capital city of Zagreb, is the latest of several cases of concern to the Mission.
Daruvar Municipal Court has ordered the sale of Mr. Zabrdac's home in Daruvar at an auction next Thursday.
Mr. Zabrdac, who repossessed his house in September 2003 after a long legal battle, is facing the loss of his home as he is unable to pay court-ordered compensation to the temporary occupant who lived in his home since 1992.
In July 2002, the Daruvar Municipal Court ordered Mr. Zabrdac to compensate the temporary occupant 44,000 HRK (approx. 5,800 euros) for alleged investments made to the house. These investments were made without the consent of Mr. Zabrdac. The Bjelovar County Court later upheld the verdict on appeal.
The Head of the OSCE Mission, Ambassador Peter Semneby, commented that this case highlights the biased decisions taken by courts in repossession cases and emphasised that such court practices should be stopped.
"Stevo Zabrdac's case is not an isolated one," he said.
"The Mission is aware of numerous other such cases, which all highlight the need for urgent change in the current legislation and in court practice."
The OSCE Mission has already proposed amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure aimed at forbidding counterclaims for investments from temporary occupants of private property.
The recent case of Stevo Zabrdac, a Serb refugee living near the town of Daruvar, two hours from the capital city of Zagreb, is the latest of several cases of concern to the Mission.
Daruvar Municipal Court has ordered the sale of Mr. Zabrdac's home in Daruvar at an auction next Thursday.
Mr. Zabrdac, who repossessed his house in September 2003 after a long legal battle, is facing the loss of his home as he is unable to pay court-ordered compensation to the temporary occupant who lived in his home since 1992.
In July 2002, the Daruvar Municipal Court ordered Mr. Zabrdac to compensate the temporary occupant 44,000 HRK (approx. 5,800 euros) for alleged investments made to the house. These investments were made without the consent of Mr. Zabrdac. The Bjelovar County Court later upheld the verdict on appeal.
The Head of the OSCE Mission, Ambassador Peter Semneby, commented that this case highlights the biased decisions taken by courts in repossession cases and emphasised that such court practices should be stopped.
"Stevo Zabrdac's case is not an isolated one," he said.
"The Mission is aware of numerous other such cases, which all highlight the need for urgent change in the current legislation and in court practice."
The OSCE Mission has already proposed amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure aimed at forbidding counterclaims for investments from temporary occupants of private property.