-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender equality conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
Ukraine’s Constitutional Court abolishes regulations limiting religious assemblies following OSCE advice and assistance
- Date:
- Place:
- KYIV
- Source:
- OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Human rights, Rule of law
KYIV, 14 September 2016 - Legal provisions requiring prior permission from authorities for religious gatherings are not compliant with the country’s basic law, reads a decision of Ukraine’s Constitutional Court announced on 13 September 2016 in Kyiv.
The ruling takes into account the consultative opinion provided by the OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine upon the Court’s request. It also makes reference to European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case-law and the Guidelines on Freedom of Peaceful Assembly produced by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) and the European Commission for Democracy through Law of the Council of Europe (Venice Commission).
Specifically, the Court declared unconstitutional Article 21(5) of the Law on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations, as well as the notorious Soviet-era decree of 1988 issued by the USSR Supreme Council’s Presidium on the procedure for organizing and holding meetings, rallies, street marches and demonstrations.
It thereby confirmed that citizens wishing to organize a religious gathering must follow the regular procedure applying to civic activists intending to hold a peaceful assembly: they need to notify the authorities, not seek permission from them.
With this judgment the Court confirmed the principle of “friendly treatment of international law”, taking into account ECtHR case-law when interpreting constitutional rights and freedoms. This principle is of special importance for the constitutional complaint mechanism that is being introduced in Ukraine by recently-adopted constitutional amendments entering into effect as of 30 September this year.
“We are proud that the OSCE is able to play a role in helping Ukraine open access to constitutional justice in such a fundamental way,” said Vaidotas Verba, the OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine.
The Project Co-ordinator provided its consultative opinion as part of its mandate to assist Ukrainian partner institutions. It also assists the Constitutional Court to introduce a direct constitutional complaint, which is an important part of Ukraine’s constitutional reform allowing citizens to directly appeal to the Court if they feel a law is unconstitutional. OSCE’s co-operation with the Court was highlighted during the meeting of OSCE Secretary General Lamberto Zannier with Court’s chairman Yuriy Baulin on 9 September 2016.
Both the judgment and the consultative opinion provided by the OSCE Project Co-ordinator’s Legal Advisor can be accessed on the Court’s website (http://ccu.gov.ua/docs/1924).