-
Our work
-
Fields of work
- Arms control
- Border management
- Combating trafficking in human beings
- Conflict prevention and resolution
- Countering terrorism
- Cyber/ICT Security
- Democratization
- Economic activities
- Education
- Elections
- Environmental activities
- Gender equality
- Good governance
- Human rights
- Media freedom and development
- Migration
- National minority issues
- Policing
- Reform and co-operation in the security sector
- Roma and Sinti
- Rule of law
- Tolerance and non-discrimination
- Youth
- Field operations
- Projects
-
Meetings and conferences
- Summit meetings
- Review Conferences
- Ministerial Council meetings
- Plenary meetings of the Permanent Council
- Plenary Meetings of the Forum for Security Co-operation
- Security Review Conferences
- Annual Implementation Assessment Meetings
- Economic and Environmental Forum
- Economic and Environmental Dimension Implementation Meetings
- Human rights meetings
- Media conferences
- Cyber/ICT security conferences
- Conference of the Alliance against Trafficking in Persons
- Gender Equality Review Conferences
- Annual OSCE Mediterranean conferences
- Annual OSCE Asian conferences
- Partnerships
-
Fields of work
-
Countries
- All
-
Participating States
- Albania
- Andorra
- Armenia
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
- Belgium
- Belarus
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Canada
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland – OSCE Chairpersonship 2025
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Holy See
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Moldova
- Monaco
- Mongolia
- Montenegro
- The Netherlands
- North Macedonia
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russian Federation
- San Marino
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tajikistan
- Türkiye
- Turkmenistan
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- United States of America
- Uzbekistan
- Asian Partners for Co-operation
- Mediterranean Partners for Co-operation
-
Structures and institutions
- Chairpersonship
-
Secretariat
- Secretary General
- Office of the Secretary General
- Conflict Prevention Centre
- Transnational Threats Department
- Office of the Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings
- Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities
- Gender Issues Programme
- Opportunities for Youth
- Department of Human Resources
- Department of Management and Finance
- Office of Internal Oversight
- Documentation Centre in Prague
- Institutions
-
Field operations
- Presence in Albania
- Centre in Ashgabat
- Programme Office in Astana
- Programme Office in Bishkek
- Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Programme Office in Dushanbe
- Mission in Kosovo
- Mission to Moldova
- Mission to Montenegro
- Mission to Serbia
- Mission to Skopje
- Project Co-ordinator in Uzbekistan
- Closed field activities
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Court of Conciliation and Arbitration
- Organizational structure
- About us
Press release
Croatian parliamentarians discuss media law amendments with experts
- Date:
- Place:
- ZAGREB
- Source:
- OSCE Mission to Croatia (closed)
- Fields of work:
- Media freedom and development
ZAGREB, 12 October 1998 - On Friday, 9 October, the OSCE Mission to Croatia organized a meeting between members of the House of Representatives of the Parliament and media experts from the Council of Europe, in order to discuss amendments to the HRT Law.
Journalists from Croatian media were present throughout the meeting. The experts were Mr Christophe Poirel, Head of the Media Section at the Council of Europe; Mr Karol Jakubowicz, Head of Strategic Planning and Plenipotentiary of the Board of Management for Restructuring at Polish Television; and Mr Norman McLean, Deputy Director of the Broadcasting Standards Commission, in the United Kingdom. Mr Vladimir Seks described the bill of amendments that has been prepared by the HDZ Club of MPs, while Mr Bozo Kovacevic described the alternative bill prepared by a group of six parties in opposition. The experts began by acknowledging that several of the Council of Europe's earlier recommendations - offered in March of this year - had been included in the HDZ draft amendments.
They went on to remark that nothing was unique about the challenge of transforming HRT into a public broadcaster. Identical problems had, they said, arisen throughout Central and Eastern Europe. The experts emphasized that Croatia is not required to make exceptional reforms in the broadcasting sector, beyond what has been achieved elsewhere. They expressed hope that Croatia would want to learn from the experience of other countries in transition in order to avoid mistakes that, once made, were difficult to rectify.
The experts noted that all transitional countries are trying to define what the "public interest" is, and hence they all need to address the threat of "the politicization of everything in public life" - a threat that is less serious and immediate in the mature democracies of Western Europe. They also pointed out that democratic institutions in the transitional countries are very fragile; special care must be taken to protect them.
While it is true that there is no single model of public broadcasting, the criteria for judging whether or not an institution, or a body within an institution, is independent, are more or less universal. In this context, and recalling the Council of Europe's "Recommendations for the further democratization of the broadcasting sector in Croatia" (March 1998), the experts offered the following concrete suggestions for amending the HRT Law:
Journalists from Croatian media were present throughout the meeting. The experts were Mr Christophe Poirel, Head of the Media Section at the Council of Europe; Mr Karol Jakubowicz, Head of Strategic Planning and Plenipotentiary of the Board of Management for Restructuring at Polish Television; and Mr Norman McLean, Deputy Director of the Broadcasting Standards Commission, in the United Kingdom. Mr Vladimir Seks described the bill of amendments that has been prepared by the HDZ Club of MPs, while Mr Bozo Kovacevic described the alternative bill prepared by a group of six parties in opposition. The experts began by acknowledging that several of the Council of Europe's earlier recommendations - offered in March of this year - had been included in the HDZ draft amendments.
They went on to remark that nothing was unique about the challenge of transforming HRT into a public broadcaster. Identical problems had, they said, arisen throughout Central and Eastern Europe. The experts emphasized that Croatia is not required to make exceptional reforms in the broadcasting sector, beyond what has been achieved elsewhere. They expressed hope that Croatia would want to learn from the experience of other countries in transition in order to avoid mistakes that, once made, were difficult to rectify.
The experts noted that all transitional countries are trying to define what the "public interest" is, and hence they all need to address the threat of "the politicization of everything in public life" - a threat that is less serious and immediate in the mature democracies of Western Europe. They also pointed out that democratic institutions in the transitional countries are very fragile; special care must be taken to protect them.
While it is true that there is no single model of public broadcasting, the criteria for judging whether or not an institution, or a body within an institution, is independent, are more or less universal. In this context, and recalling the Council of Europe's "Recommendations for the further democratization of the broadcasting sector in Croatia" (March 1998), the experts offered the following concrete suggestions for amending the HRT Law:
- Members of Parliament should not be eligible for appointment to the HRT Council.
- Parliament should not have the right to veto appointments to the HRT Council. The Director of HRT should be appointed by the HRT Council, not by Parliament. Members of the Management Board and key members of HRT staff should not be allowed to hold party office. The Law should allow for the privatization of the third channel of HTV.